Legal Opinion

Gordon Supply Co. v. Galuska

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 17, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of complaint is brought to enjoin defendant in accordance with the terms of an agreement of employment which recites that the complainant is engaged in the laundry business and supplying service in the cities of "Newark, the Oranges, Morristown, Dover, Paterson, Passaic, Hackensack, Rutherford, Englewood, Jersey City, Hoboken, Elizabeth, Plainfield, Dunellen, Bound Brook, Somerville, New Brunswick, Perth Amboy and the smaller municipalities adjacent these cities, city of New York and its vicinity," and the defendant is thereunder engaged as a driver, collector and canvasser at a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  2. A. Fink Sons v. GoldbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Mandeville v. HarmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886
  4. Meaney v. StorkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
  5. Newbery v. BarkalowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Renwood Food Products, Inc. v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Roy v. BolducSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  4. Renwood Food Products v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Silbros, Inc. v. SolomonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API