Legal Opinion

Roy v. Bolduc

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 20, 1943PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•Sturgis, C. J.

This is a proceeding in equity to restrain a former salesman from competing with the real estate agent by whom he had been employed. Answer having been made and replication filed, on hearing, a decree dismissing the bill with costs was signed and entered. The case comes forward on appeal.

The printed case shows that the plaintiff Joseph A. Roy had for several years been a real estate agent in Waterville, Maine, and has established a substantial and lucrative business. The methods he has used in attaining this success, however, have been neither original nor unique. He is a heavy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Club Aluminum Co. v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  2. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. Technical Aid Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API