Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2010No. 2009-2244PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, F. Benjamin Riek III of Shaker Heights, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022703, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1978. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for 18 months, with 12 months of the suspension stayed upon the condition that he commit no further misconduct. We accept the board’s findings of professional misconduct and the recommendation of an 18-month, partially stayed, conditional suspension.

{¶ 2} Relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent in a two-count complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. MilesOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. CrosbyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KarpOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. EichenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API