Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Thompson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2014No. 2013-1262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Harold Lee Thompson of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0033253, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1975. In March 1982, we publicly reprimanded Thompson based on findings that he had withdrawn unearned funds from his client trust account to meet personal and office expenses and caused an overdraft of the account. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 69 Ohio St.2d 667, 433 N.E.2d 602 (1982).

{¶ 2} On December 10, 2012, a probable-cause panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline certified to the board a three-count complaint filed against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. RiekOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Gay.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Davis v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API