Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Eichenberger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2016No. 2015-1315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Raymond Leland Eichenberger III of Reynoldsburg, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022464, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1980. In a June 2014 complaint, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Eichenber-ger with professional misconduct arising from an overdraft of his client trust account, his use of his client trust accounts as a personal bank account, and his failure to cooperate in the resulting disciplinary investigation.

{¶ 2} The parties entered into stipulations of fact and mitigation and submitted 27 stipulated exhibits to the panel of the Board of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ashtabula Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brown (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Six v. Gahanna Trailer ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API