Legal Opinion

Hirschfeld v. Commissioner of the Division of Parole

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 8, 2003No. 03 Civ. 0098(KMW)(RLE)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 22, 2003, pro se habeas corpus petitioner Abraham Hirschfeld (“Hirschfeld”) issued notices for the depositions of three individuals, which would take place on May 9, 2003. He subsequently sought the Court’s permission to conduct the depositions. Respondent argues that Hirschfeld has failed to demonstrate the necessary good cause to entitle him to discovery. For the reasons following, Hirschfeld’s request is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

II. BACKGROUND

On January 6, 2003, Hirschfeld filed a petition for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Beatty v. GreinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Superintendent, Southport C.F.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Martin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Pizzuti v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Wright v. PooleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Perez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API