Legal Opinion
Wright v. Poole
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 17, 2014No. 02-CV-8669 (KMK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
Pro se Petitioner Bruce Wright (“Petitioner”), moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 for the Court to vacate its prior Order, which adopted Magistrate Judge Mark D. Fox’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) and dismissed Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”). (See Order Adopting R & R (“Order”) (Dkt. No. 87).) For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Petitioner’s Motion.
I. Background
A. Factual Background
Although the Court assumes the Parties’ general familiarity with the factual and procedural…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Olin Corp. v. Lamorak Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- First Union Baptist Church of the Bronx v. TD Capital Group LLC (In re First Union Baptist Church of the Bronx)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- 53rd Street LLC v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Earnest v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
- FINK v. BISHOPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.