Legal Opinion
Pizzuti v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 18, 2011No. Nos. 10 Civ. 199(RJH)(HBP), 10 Civ. 2585(RJH)(HBP), 02 Cr. 1237(RJH)(HBP)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. Introduction
By motions dated July 23, September 13 and September 27, 2010 (Docket Item 5 in 10 Civ. 2585 and Docket Items 330 and 334 in 02 Cr. 1237), petitioners Angelo DiPietro and Michael Pizzuti move for discovery. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, petitioners are entitled to all FBI Form 302’s and notes concerning interviews with or debriefings of Maurizio Sanginiti, including an unredacted version of the Form 302 DiPietro received in response to his FOIA request.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Sherman FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Martin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Anilao v. SpotaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Velazquez-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Abdi v. DukeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.