Legal Opinion

Morser v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELT, J.-

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of having been struck by a south-bound electric train running between Portland and Oswego, operated by the defendant company. This cause was here on a former appeal (110 Or. 9, 222 Pac. 736) and the judgment was reversed for the reason that plaintiff was held guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of law. On retrial, a verdict was again rendered for plaintiff. Hence this appeal.

The accident occurred October 18; 1921, at about 5:40 a. m., in the outskirts of the City of Portland, as plaintiff was crossing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Olds v. HinesOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Morser v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Morley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Van Zandt v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Dunning v. Northwestern Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Keys v. GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API