Legal Opinion

Olds v. Hines

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1920PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The plaintiff, a young man about nineteen years of age, by his guardian ad litem in this action sues Walker D. Hines as director-general of the United States Railroad Administration, and Jones and Amundson, the engineer and fireman in charge of a train of the Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Company, for damages on account of an injury which he received in a collision between a train on that road and a motor truck which he was operating at the time.

Read the full summary

The plaintiff, a young man about nineteen years of age, by his guardian ad litem in this action sues Walker D. Hines as director-general of the United States Railroad Administration, and Jones and Amundson, the engineer and fireman in charge of a train of the Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Company, for damages on account of an injury which he received in a collision between a train on that road and a motor truck which he was operating at the time. The accident occurred in the City of Portland where the railroad track crosses Fifteenth Street. The ground of negligence charged against the…

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

A brief résumé of the testimony is here set down: Fifteenth, Sixteenth and Seventeenth Streets in Portland run due north and south. The Spokane, Portland «fe Seattle Railway track on which the accident happened comes from the northwest on a slight curve to the left across these streets. There are some docks situated on the bank of the Willamette River near the foot of Fifteenth Street. The plaintiff was an experienced truckman and quite familiar with the crossing and the surroundings, having driven over the tracks there for about a year before the accident. On the day in question he had gone…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Kelsay v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Payne v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hunter v. N. Y., Ontario & Western R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Van Zandt v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hardie v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Grant v. Chicago Etc. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API