Legal Opinion

Condit v. Condit

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1916No. 7806PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Stephen D. Condit-and Melissa O- Condit against Ralph F. 'Condit, Beatrice May Condit, and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the named defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BDEAKMORE, C.

On February 21, 1915, Stephen D. Condit and Melissa O. Condit as plaintiffs commenced action against Julia F- Steele, Ralph F.# Condit, Beatrice May Condit, a minor, Julia F. Steele, as guardian, and M. L. Moore, defendants, seeking a decree quieting the title to certain lands. There was judgment for plaintiffs, from which Ralph F. and Beatrice May Condit have appealed.

In the petition it is alleged that by virtue of certain conveyances the title to the lands involved vested in one Edward B. Condit, who thereafter died intestate, leaving surviving him the defendants,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bolling v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Williams v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Bruner v. NordmeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Scott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Oklahoma City v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API