Legal Opinion

City of Sharonville v. American Employers Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2006No. 2004-1735PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This case, involving the question of an insurer’s duty to defend law-enforcement officers in a civil rights action, is accepted upon a discretionary appeal.

{¶ 2} A federal action was filed against the city of Sharonville, Ohio and three of its current or former police officers.1 The officers were sued in their official capacity over an alleged ongoing conspiracy to cover up evidence relating to the *187murders of Marie Wright Schuholz and Starla Burns on May 8, 1981. The third amended complaint alleges that James Cramer, William Nuss, Mike Schappa, and other unknown officers (“John Doe(s)”)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Ohio Government Risk Management Plan v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lager v. Miller-GonzalezOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. CPS Holdings, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Westfield Insurance v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API