Legal Opinion
Bristol Bank & Trust Co. v. Broderick
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 8, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
On March 31st, 1930, Mary Broderick gave to the Bristol Trust Company her note for $6000 payable on demand with interest payable quarterly in advance and an agreement that a payment of $200 would be made on the principal on May 1st, 1930, and every month thereafter until the note was paid in full. The note was secured by a third mortgage upon property in Bristol, the two prior mortgages upon which were also held by the Trust Company. All three mortgages were assigned to the plaintiff. The defendant Vincent Broderick and two others signed a guaranty of this note which read as follows: “We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hood v. . HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Calamita v. DeponteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- City of Deering v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893
- Brown v. Pacific Coast AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Sherman County v. NicholsNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D'ippolito v. CastoroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Lestorti v. DeLeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Cusick v. IfshinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Winthrop Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Lestorti v. DeLeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010