Brown v. Pacific Coast Agency
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting aside an order directing that execution issue. George H. Cahaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside an order directing that execution issue. Plaintiff, on September 20, 1911, obtained a judgment against Jacobi, Rothchild, Conant, and Muller, joint guarantors on a promissory note. The judgment called for $9,231.57 and $1,000 attorneys’ fees and costs of suit. On December 29, 1911, the defendants Rothchild and Conant paid on said judgment $8,500, taking a satisfaction "of judgment to that extent and a release which contained the express reservation that it should “not operate to release said I. L. Jacobi and said Otto Muller from the payment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Hood v. . HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Whittemore v. Judd Linseed & Sperm Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Irvine v. . MillbankNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Northern Insurance v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Natrona Power Co. v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Demens v. HueneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Uhl Estate Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Colby v. ColbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.