Legal Opinion
Calamita v. Deponte
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
This action is the aftermath of the case of State v. Pashall, 118 Conn. 645, 174 Atl. 175, in which the State secured judgment against the plaintiffs as sureties upon a bail bond for the appearance of Ralph Mele in court to answer a criminal charge, Mele having made default of appearance. In this action the plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the defendants requested them to become sureties upon the bond, promising that if they did so the defendants “would fully indemnify the plaintiffs for the amount of such bond and any expenses in connection therewith to which the plaintiffs were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morehouse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Reed v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- City of Bridgeport v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Andrews v. New Britain National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Davis v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- 24 Leggett Street Ltd. Partnership v. Beacon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sorensen v. the Overland CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Liberty Auto & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Balboa Insurance v. ZaleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Town of Fairfield v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.