State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Houle
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
At issue in this case are the coverage limits associated with underinsured motorist (UIM) insurance and whether coverage provided under disputed insurance policies complies with the requirements of Alaska insurance statutes. The respondent families hold UIM policies. They allege that they have suffered emotional distress and loss of consortium as a result of a collision that killed one family's child and severely injured the other family's child. The insurer accepts that the policyholders incurred damages. However, it contends that the families…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DunlopAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Kathleen M. Downing v. Country Life Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Bearden v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. FernsideDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
- Baxter Senior Living, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.