Legal Opinion

State v. Dunlop

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1986No. S-923, S-1163PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This case arises out of two separate criminal actions, State v. Dunlop and State v. Thomas, consolidated because they raise similar claims under the Alaska Constitution’s double jeopardy provision. Alaska Const, art I., § 9. 1 The main issue is whether a defendant can receive multiple sentences for injuring or killing more than one person while driving under the influence of alcohol. The state requests that we overrule or modify our holdings in Thessen v. State, 508 P.2d 1192 (Alaska 1973), and State v. Souter, 606 P.2d 399 (Alaska 1980), where we held that separate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Valerio Ernest Miranda v. Thomas Cooper, Superintendent, and Frank Gunter, (Gunther) Sic, Director, D.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API