Legal Opinion

Bearden v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2013No. 6775 S-14345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The question in this appeal is whether a defendant who pleads no contest to disorderly conduct in a criminal action can be collaterally estopped from relitigating the elements of that crime in a related civil declaratory judgment action regarding insurance coverage, thereby precluding coverage.

Kent Bearden pleaded no contest to disorderly conduct for punching Paul Rasmussen during a physical altercation. Rasmussen subsequently filed a civil complaint against Bearden, and Bearden tendered the lawsuit to State Farm Insurance Company to defend and indemnify…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Scott v. RobertsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fejes v. Alaska Ins. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Fred Michael Esguerra Jr. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API