Legal Opinion

Budai v. Teague

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 14, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

212 N.J. Super. 522 (1986)

515 A.2d 822

CAROL BUDAI AND JOHN BUDAI, SR., PLAINTIFFS,

v.

JAMES TEAGUE AND LOIS ANN TEAGUE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Somerset County.

Decided March 14, 1986.

Richard H. Thiele, for plaintiffs (Thiele & Hermes, attorneys).

Paul A. Woodford, for defendants (O'Donnell, McCord, Leslie & O'Toole, attorneys).

ARNOLD, J.S.C.

The plaintiff, Carol Budai, brought this action seeking recovery for serious injuries sustained when she was bitten by the defendants' dog. Her husband, John Budai, sues per quod. They have brought a motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. DeRobertis v. RandazzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Green v. Sterling Extruder Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Foy v. DaykoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Rowland v. WunderlickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SH by and Through Robinson v. BistryskiUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pingaro v. RossiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Stroop v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Veronda v. RenaeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  5. ALIESETTE RUSSO VS. CREATIONS BY STEFANO, INC. (L-1757-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API