Legal Opinion

Foy v. Dayko

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 7, 1964PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

82 N.J. Super. 8 (1964)

196 A.2d 535

THOMAS FOY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

DANIEL DAYKO AND JULIA DAYKO, INDIVIDUALLY AND T/A SEA HORSE TAVERN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 18, 1963.

Decided January 7, 1964.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.

Mr. A. Henry Giordano argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Maurice B. McLaughlin argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

This case presents the novel question whether provocation or contributory negligence are defenses to an action for a dog bite…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Canavan v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Emmons v. StevaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. De Gray v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  5. Ryan v. MarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Boileau v. De CeccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. DeRobertis v. RandazzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Fivehouse v. Passaic Valley Water Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Tanga v. TangaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Resorts International Hotel, Inc. v. SalomoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API