Legal Opinion

Green v. Sterling Extruder Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 8, 1984PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

Under the current state of our law in the strict liability context, contributory negligence in any of its varied forms (excluding, of course, any intentional or willful act) will not foreclose a factory worker who is injured while using a defective machine for a reasonably foreseeable purpose from recovering against the machine’s manufacturer. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & Mach. Co., 81 N.J. 150, 177 (1979). Nor may such negligence of the worker serve to reduce any award in his favor under principles of comparative negligence, N.J.S.A.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Coffman v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Tirrell v. Navistar Intern., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Jurado v. Western Gear WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Allstate Insurance v. MalecSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API