Krouse v. Brevard Tannin Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville; James E. Boyd, Judge. Suit in equity by Charles C. Krouse and Fouis T. McFadden against the Brevard Tannin Company and William F. Decker. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
ÍPlaiuliffs are citizens and inhabitants of the state of Pennsylvania. Defendant Brevard Tannin Company is a corporation chartered pursuant to the laws of North Carolina, January 13, 1903, conducting its corporate business in the Western district of said state. Defendant, Win, F. Decker, is a citizen and in-, habitant of the same state.
Plaintiffs, in their bill, allege: That the objects and purposes for which defendant corporation was formed are: To erect and opérale factories for the manufacture of tanning extracts, and other extract:; obtained front trees, bark,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Schuckman v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Galdi v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.