Scott v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks judicial review of two orders of the Board of Parole.1 We conclude that we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the petitions.
Petitioner assigns error to the Board’s decision in 1991 that he maintains set his parole consideration hearing date for June 16, 2009. However, his parole consideration hearing date was changed to June 16,2009, by a March 1989, order of the Board. Neither administrative nor judicial review was sought from the 1989 order. The Board’s decision in 1991 merely affirmed the previously determined date.
ORS 144.335(1) provides:
“When a person over whom the board…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Willaby v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sidney Walter Scott v. George Baldwin, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997