Legal Opinion

Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1998No. CA A88960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. In that order, petitioner was designated a predatory sex offender (PSO) and ordered to undergo a mental health evaluation and to obtain sexual offender treatment and counseling. The period of post-prison supervision (PPS) was set at 210 months, a time period that, when added to his incarceration time, equaled the maximum term of the indefinite sentence for the offense for which petitioner was convicted.

Petitioner argues that he was entitled to a contested-case hearing before being labeled a PSO,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Scott v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Troiano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mannelin v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Wilcox v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Wilcox v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API