Legal Opinion

Sidney Walter Scott v. George Baldwin, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2000No. 99-35132PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge:

Sidney Walter Scott, an inmate at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Scott claims that the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision’s (the Board) denial of biennial reviews of his status as a “dangerous offender” violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. The district court denied Scott’s petition. Scott appealed to this court; we affirm the district court’s order.

I. Background

Scott was convicted in 1979 of first degree rape, attempted murder, and first degree sexual assault. Scott raped a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Jiminez v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  2. State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Biggs v. Secretary of the California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Reynolds v. CambraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
  5. Shafer v. BowersoxDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API