Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision finding that he had violated his post-prison supervision (PPS) and imposing a 90-day prison sanction for the violation. He argues that the Board erred in revoking his PPS without giving him a hearing or receiving a waiver of his right to a hearing. The Board responds that the order is moot and therefore not justiciable, because on June 10, 1996, petitioner completed the sanction imposed. See Barcik v. Kubiaczyk, 321 Or 174,186, 895 P2d 765 (1995) (if plaintiffs’ claims are moot, they may not be addressed).
We…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. NeidenbachOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Scott v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Jones v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Wilcox v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005