Legal Opinion

Langford v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1993No. 23786PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Terry Lynn Langford (Langford) and a co-defendant were represented by partners from the same law firm in a criminal prosecution. Langford’s application for postconviction relief (PCR), alleging that his attorney was deficient for failing to inform him of the dangers of dual representation after his co-defendant decided to plead guilty, was dismissed by the PCR judge. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Langford, Terry Howard (Howard) and Edwin Todd (Todd) were charged with three counts of burglary, two counts of grand larceny, and one count of assault and battery with intent to kill.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Vance v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Goins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API