Legal Opinion

Vance v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1980No. 21262PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant Roy Vance entered pleas of guilty to armed robbery and housebreaking. This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

On appeal, appellant contends trial counsel’s joint representation of appellant and a co-defendant presented a conflict of interest. Neither appellant, his co-defendant nor their trial counsel voiced any objection to the joint representation at the time the pleas were entered. Appellant had determined to plead guilty prior to meeting with his attorney, to whom he freely admitted his guilt.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Myers v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John R. Hoffman v. William D. Leeke, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. Langford v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Edgemon v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Goins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API