Legal Opinion

Lomax v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 2008No. 26525PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BEATTY:

In this post-conviction relief case, the Court granted certiorari to review the PCR judge’s denial of relief for Freddie Vernell Lomax’s plea of guilty to multiple drug offenses. In her petition, Lomax’s (Petitioner’s) sole contention is that the PCR judge erred in failing to find a conflict of interest existed when her plea counsel simultaneously represented both Petitioner and her husband during guilty pleas which arose out of related offenses. We reverse the decision of the PCR judge.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 20, 1997, Petitioner distributed crack cocaine to an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Richard Zuck v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Goins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API