Legal Opinion
Schneider v. McDaniel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2012No. 09-16945PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WALLACE; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Petitioner-Appellant Ralph Schneider seeks review pursuant to a certifícate of appealability of the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Schneider petitioned for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His First Amended Petition stated eight grounds for relief. The district court denied the petition entirely, but granted a certificate of appealability on the following issues: (1) the rejection of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- David Ramirez v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Matthew Sexton v. Mike CoznerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Robert Walden v. David ShinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Ayala v. WongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Michael Gonzales v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.