Legal Opinion

State v. Lippert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90-05-1642-C; CA A65707PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*431BUTTLER, P. J.

The state appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress the contents of a paperfold removed from defendant’s pocket after he had been taken into protective custody for detoxification. ORS 426.460.1 The paperfold was found to contain cocaine. The question is whether that evidence can be used in a criminal prosecution.

Officer Pfaff was dispatched to a fraternal club, where he encountered defendant sitting on the sidewalk, highly intoxicated; he had twice been removed from the club by the manager. Instead of arresting defendant for criminal trespass and resisting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. NewmanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. WestlundOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. OkekeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LippertOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API