Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 1992No. 90CR0974FE; CA A66034Published

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions by a jury on four counts of forgery in the first degree, ORS 165.013. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence removed from his pocket during a routine inventory after he had been taken into protective custody pursuant to ORS 426.460.1 We reverse.

Officer Cotterell saw defendant at 3:15 a.m., stumbling and staggering on a public sidewalk. He decided that defendant was intoxicated. He took defendant’s name and did a routine record check. The two spoke for a couple of minutes, and Cotterell made inquiries about taking defendant to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OkekeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LippertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API