Legal Opinion

State v. Bunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1993No. C9008-34686; CA A68797PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion, 116 Or App 6, 840 P2d 106 (1992), which reversed defendant’s conviction on the basis of our decision in State v. Lippert, 112 Or App 429, 829 P2d 1020 (1992). In that version of Lippert, we held that a cocaine paperfold is inadmissible if obtained without a warrant during a routine search of an individual taken into protective custody for detoxification.

The Oregon Supreme Court allowed review of Lip-pert, and reversed this court. State v. Lippert, 317 Or 397, 856 P2d 634 (1993). It held that, when an individual is justifiably placed in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LippertOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LippertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API