Legal Opinion

State v. Lippert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1993No. CC 90-05-1642-C, CA A65707 and SC S39473PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this criminal case, the trial court granted defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress the contents of a paperfold found in defendant’s pocket after he was taken into civil custody for detoxification. The Court of Appeals affirmed the suppression order. State v. Lippert, 112 Or App 429, 829 P2d 1020 (1992). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The relevant facts are undisputed. On February 24, 1990, the manager of the Elks Club in Burns called the police to complain about a person at the club. A police officer arrived and found defendant “highly intoxicated.” Rather than arrest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FulmerOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. HerrinOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lindsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API