Legal Opinion

Gillmor v. MacEy

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 25, 2005No. Case No. 20030368-CAPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant Nadine Gillmor (Nadine) appeals from several aspects of the trial court’s interpretation of an “Easement And Use Agreement” (the Agreement). Appellees and Cross-Appellants Robin and Ken Macey (the Maceys), individually and as owners of Family Link, L.L.C., and David K. Richards & Co. (Richards Co.), likewise cross-appeal from some of the trial court’s interpretations of the Agreement. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The genesis of this ease dates back to a 1984 dispute between Nadine’s late husband, Charles Frank Gillmor, Jr. (Frank), and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. ToledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Gillmor v. Family Link, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Watkins v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re Foreclosure 1107 SnowberryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Cantamar, L.L.C. v. ChampagneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  5. UDAK Properties v. Canyon CreekCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API