Legal Opinion

Tate v. Rose

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1909No. 1981PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second-District.. Han. J. A'. Soivellj Judge. . •. . Action to quiet title, by Francis Tate, Administrator, against Andrew Nose. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.

This is an action to quiet title to certain lands in Weber county, Utah. The respondent, in substance, alleged that one George S. Tate, on the-day of January, 1900, died intestate ; that at the time of his death said deceased was the owner and in possession of certain real estate, described as the west half of the southwest quarter of section 18, township Y, range 1 west, Salt Lake meridian, United States survey; that on the 30th day of March, 190Y, the respondent was duly appointed administrator of the estate of said George S. Tate, deceased, and that respondent is the duly qualified and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kidder v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Stanley v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Eltzroth v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bell v. Couch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Peery's Administrator v. ElliottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hobson v. Security State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. SantiagoUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Harman v. YeagerUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kimball v. McCornickUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Worley v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API