Legal Opinion

Eltzroth v. Ryan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1891No. 13723PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

— This is an action to quiet title to a quarter-section of land in Tulare County. The complaint was filed March 13,1888, and is in the usual form in such cases. Defendant Ryan did not appear. Defendant Wythe appeared, and by his answer denied all the averments of the complaint, and alleged that each of the defendants had a legal title and interest in the land and premises in question.

At the trial the plaintiff was a witness, and. testified that he purchased the quarter-section in controversy from the United States, but that he never received the patent for it, and did not know what…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Jolley v. FoltzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Chipley v. FarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Kidder v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Kane v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Antilla v. Justice's Court of Big River Twp.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tate v. RoseUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Weisshand v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API