Legal Opinion

Harman v. Yeager

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1941No. 6244PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Plaintiff instituted this action against defendants Yeager and others to quiet title to a small tract of land in Salt Lake County. The complaint was in the usual form for actions to quiet title, greatly abbreviated. Defendants Yeager filed an answer and no demurrer to the answer was interposed. When the cause was called for trial plaintiff, upon suggestion of the trial court, moved for a judgment on the pleadings. Defendants Yeager then asked leave to amend their answer. The court denied the request for leave to amend and entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Currie v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hancock v. LukeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Chesney v. ChesneyUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Tate v. RoseUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bowles v. DobleOregon Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co v. CleggUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. Consolidated Steelcraft v. KnowltonUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Stuckey v. Bank of TrumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API