Daum v. Urquhart
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.
From the year 1910 down to the time of the trial of this action, defendant has resided in Huron and been engaged in the business of selling Ford cars and accessories and parts of Ford cars. From some time in 1913 until the 18th day of July, 1930, plaintiff was employed by defendant in his said automobile business. For the first few months plaintiff worked as a mechanic in assembling cars. For some time thereafter he was engaged in selling accessories and parts, but was soon promoted to the sales department, where he sold cars and made collections, as well as to sell parts and accessories.
On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Morrill v. NightingaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Haynes v. . RuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Woodham v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bane v. DetrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Erck v. BachandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- White Motor Corp. v. Northland Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1970