Legal Opinion
City of Tyler v. Beck
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2006No. 04-0813PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
Timothy and Susan Beck owned real property that the City of Tyler initiated proceedings to condemn. Three appointed special commissioners assessed damages to the Becks and entered an award. TEX. PROP. CODE § 21.014. The City, and then the Becks, filed objections to the award and sent copies to opposing counsel, but neither issued formal service of citation on the other as the Property Code requires. Id. § 21.018(b); see also Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co., 682 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tex.1985) (citing Denton County v. Brammer, 361 S.W.2d 198, 200 (Tex.1962)). The trial court dismissed the case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Denton County v. BrammerTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- TAC Americas, Inc. v. Boothe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- State v. ReehCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- In re Lazy W District No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 2016
- John Boerschig v. Trans-Pecos Pipeline, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- State v. Montgomery County, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- Harris County, Texas v. Union Pacific R. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- James B. Bonham Corp. v. the City of Corsicana, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.