Legal Opinion

Harris County, Texas v. Union Pacific R. Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 9, 2011No. Civil Action H-10-4363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Harris County, Texas’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 5), as well as Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Union Pacific”) Response (Doc. 6) and Harris County’s Reply (Doc. 8). Also before the Court is Union Pacific’s Motion to Refer Factual Questions to Surface Transportation Board (Doc. 7), as well as Harris County’s Response (Doc. 10). Upon review and consideration of these motions, the responses and reply thereto, the relevant legal authority, and for the reasons explained below, the Court finds that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Ozark, AR v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Big Bend Telephone Co. v. Halo Wireless, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  3. in Re: Tarrant Regional Water District, a Water Control and Improvement District, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API