Legal Opinion
State v. Montgomery County
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided July 31, 2008No. 09-07-560 CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.
The State of Texas and The Texas A & M University System appeal the denial of their plea to the jurisdiction in this eminent domain proceeding initiated by Montgomery County, Texas. 1 A contract between Montgomery County and the Texas Department of Transportation requires Montgomery County to obtain and transfer to the State the fee simple title to a strip of land for a highway expansion project. The land in question runs through property managed by the Texas Forest System, which is a service of TAMUS. 2 In four issues, the appellants contend: (1) the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Reata Construction Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. Gulp & Interstate Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Tyler v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc. v. Harris County Sports & Convention Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Oncor Electric Delivery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- State v. Montgomery County, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2011
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Oncor Electric Delivery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Oncor Electric Delivery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 61 v. Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P. and V-Tex Logistics LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.