Legal Opinion

James B. Bonham Corp. v. the City of Corsicana

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 29, 2016No. 06-16-00026-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Burgess

Utilizing the power of eminent domain, the City of Corsicana (City) instituted a proceeding to condemn land owned by James B. Bonham Corp. (the Corporation) in order to construct a raw water trans mission line. Because the parties could not agree on the amount of just compensation, the City filed a condemnation petition in 2008, and the trial court appointed special commissioners to assess damages. 1 See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. §§ 20.014, 21.012 (West 2014). After a hearing, the special commissioners assessed damages in the amount of $2,900.00, and the City…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. RotelloTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of San Benito v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jerry Byrom v. Roy P. Anderson, David S. Bouschor, Law Office of David S. Bouschor II, PC, and Duane L. Coker, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2020
  2. Patrick Pence and Jodee Pence v. S&D Builders, LLC S&D Development, LLC Lange Custom Builders, LLC Steven M. Lange Summit Oak Homes, LLC And David C. Oestreich, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2021
  3. Patrick Pence and Jodee Pence v. S&D Builders, LLC S&D Development, LLC Lange Custom Builders, LLC Steven M. Lange Summit Oak Homes, LLC And David C. Oestreich, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API