Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUSK, J,

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary not in a dwelling and has appealed.

The indictment charged that the defendant “on the 19th day of November, 1962 * * '* acting together and in pursuance of a common intent with James Edward Hotaling, did then and there wilfully break and enter the Creslane Grade School building in Creswell through an outer door thereof with the intent to steal property then kept therein * *

Error is assigned to the court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict based on claimed insufficiency of the evidence. Some of the evidence for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hays v. HermanOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. ProudIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. OttenOregon Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. John Harold Howell v. Hoyt C. Cupp, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. WoolardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API