Legal Opinion

Hays v. Herman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1958PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKester, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered. Plaintiff thereupon filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. The trial court denied the judgment n.o.v., but granted a new trial. In doing so, the trial judge not only acted upon plaintiff’s motion, but he also stated that he was granting a new trial upon his own motion, reciting substantially the same grounds as were specified in plaintiff’s motion. From the order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. De Vall v. De VallOregon Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API