Hays v. Herman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKester, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered. Plaintiff thereupon filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. The trial court denied the judgment n.o.v., but granted a new trial. In doing so, the trial judge not only acted upon plaintiff’s motion, but he also stated that he was granting a new trial upon his own motion, reciting substantially the same grounds as were specified in plaintiff’s motion. From the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- De Vall v. De VallOregon Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.