Legal Opinion

State v. Woolard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1970No. C-52262PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is an appeal from conviction of larceny of a ring under OES 164.310.

Mr. Reingold and his son testified that defendant and a female companion visited Reingold’s Jewelers in Portland on September 6, 1967, and tried on some rings. The owner discovered .that a ring valued at $250 was missing and the police were called, but no arrest was made because he had not seen the ring taken. On the next day, testimony showed, defendant and a different companion, Beverly Jean McLeod, tried on several rings at another jewelry store in the same neighborhood. Together they chose a ring and the defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ClipstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Tarkington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. State v. LehmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API