State v. Woolard
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
This is an appeal from conviction of larceny of a ring under OES 164.310.
Mr. Reingold and his son testified that defendant and a female companion visited Reingold’s Jewelers in Portland on September 6, 1967, and tried on some rings. The owner discovered .that a ring valued at $250 was missing and the police were called, but no arrest was made because he had not seen the ring taken. On the next day, testimony showed, defendant and a different companion, Beverly Jean McLeod, tried on several rings at another jewelry store in the same neighborhood. Together they chose a ring and the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. ClipstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Tarkington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- State v. LehmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.