Legal Opinion

City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2011No. 32,486, 32,489PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} In 1985, at the behest of the City of Rio Rancho, Amrep Southwest Inc. recorded a plat for the Vista Hills West Unit 1 (VHWU1) subdivision, granting the City a drainage easement over ten acres identified as Parcel F. In 2004, Amrep sold Parcel F to the Mares group in fee simple, subject to the drainage easement. Mares in turn sold it to Cloudview Estates in fee simple, subject to the same recorded drainage easement. Cloudview asked the City to vacate the drainage easement and subdivide the parcel into thirty lots. The City declined because it found that the City and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Thornburg Mortgage Securities TrustDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  2. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Smith v. DurdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Abraham v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  5. AG New Mexico, FCS, ACA v. Borges (In re Borges)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API