Legal Opinion

State v. Crouch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 8412SC1006PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

By his single assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by revoking his probation. He argues that the court failed to make proper findings of facts to support its finding and conclusion that defendant’s failure to comply with the terms of probation was willful or without lawful excuse. We do not agree.

Essentially, defendant’s argument is to the effect that his evidence tended to establish defendant’s inability to comply with the terms of his probation, and that the trial court’s judgment fails to make the finding necessary to resolve the issue raised by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. SellarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. TozziCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. HeadenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API