State v. Young
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant excepts to the entry of the order of the trial court revoking the probation and ordering the sentence into effect. The defendant argues that the court did not make specific findings of fact and make conclusions of law based thereon. The court merely concluded that the defendant had willfully violated the terms and conditions of probation in failing to report and refusing to make regular payments. Defendant contends that more detailed findings of fact should have been made to allow appellate review of the trial court’s order.
The defendant relies upon the cases of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. FoustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Haynes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.