Legal Opinion

State v. Headen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 2010No. COA09-606PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Tyus Sentell Headen appeals from his conviction of voluntary manslaughter. Defendant, who is African-American, contends that the trial court erred in overruling his objection, pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69, 106 S. Ct. 1712 (1986), to the State’s peremptory challenge of a prospective juror who is also African-American. Defendant argues that he met his burden of making a prima facie showing of racial discrimination and that the State’s explanation for the challenge was a pretext for a race-based strike.

Under the applicable standard of review,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. HeadenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API